SKIP TO
CONTENT
Table of Contents
Asset Distribution in New York Divorce
This means that in the context of a divorce, any marital property (including assets and debts) is distributed in an “equitable” fashion, which, notably does not necessarily mean an equal distribution. For residents of Suffolk County and Nassau County, equitable distribution cases are heard in the Supreme Court of the respective county. In Suffolk County, contested divorce and equitable distribution matters are litigated at the Suffolk County Supreme Court in Central Islip.
How Does Equitable Distribution Work in New York?
In New York, equitable distribution is the property distribution methodology used in divorces. In equitable distribution, marital property, including assets and debts, is divided in a fair (equitable) manner.
Identification of Assets
The first step in the equitable distribution process is to identify the assets involved, which can be complex in a divorce case. The process of identifying assets is often a meticulous and strategic undertaking that serves as the foundation for equitable distribution and ensuring that property is divided. This process begins with a inventory of all assets, including tangible items like homes, vehicles, and furniture, as well as intangible assets such as bank accounts, stock options, retirement plans, cryptocurrency, and business interests. Efforts may be made to uncover hidden assets. Equally important is the identification of all liabilities, including mortgages, loans, student loans and credit card debts, which are also subject to equitable distribution.
Classifying Assets – Marital vs Separate Property in New York
After identifying an asset, the next step is to determine whether the asset is “marital property” or “separate property.” Pursuant to statute, marital property is defined as “all property acquired by either or both spouses during the marriage and before the execution of a separation agreement or the commencement of a matrimonial action, regardless of the form in which title is held. . . .” By contrast, separate property has a far more narrow definition and includes only the following:
- Property obtained prior to the marriage
- Anything defined as separate property in a prenuptial agreement
- Compensation for personal injuries
- Inheritance
Based on the statute and various caselaw, there is a strong presumption that any property acquired during the marriage is considered marital property in a New York divorce. As such, assets and debts accumulated by either party during the marriage are presumed to be marital property and subject to equitable distribution, regardless of which spouse’s name is on the title or account. A spouse seeking to overcome the presumption of marital property must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the asset at issue is indeed separate property. In Hartog v. Hartog, 85 N.Y.2d 36 (1995), the Court of Appeals addressed the commingling of separate and marital property, holding that when separate property is commingled with marital assets to such a degree that it can no longer be traced, it may lose its separate character and become subject to equitable distribution. This decision underscores the importance of maintaining clear records to preserve the separate property classification of any asset.
Valuation of Marital Assets
In a New York divorce, the evaluation of assets for equitable distribution involves a thorough and precise appraisal process to ensure a fair division of marital property. This essential phase of litigation includes detailing all assets acquired during the marriage, from real estate and vehicles to investments, retirement accounts, and even closely-held business interests. Each asset is then valued or appraised in some fashion to determine value – a task that frequently requires the expertise of financial analysts, real estate appraisers, and business valuation firms. On Long Island, where residential property values and costs of living are among the highest in the state, accurate real estate appraisals and business valuations are particularly important to achieving a fair result.
In valuing the marital assets, the goal is to provide an accurate accounting of the parties’ financial situation. Liabilities, including debts and obligations, are also evaluated to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the marital estate.
Valuation of assets may also include valuing the marital portion of an asset that otherwise has a separate property component. By way of example, a pension plan in which a party participated both prior to and during the marriage may have both a separate property component and a marital property component. The valuation date for marital property is also a significant consideration. In Keane v. Keane, 8 N.Y.3d 115 (2006), the Court of Appeals addressed the distinction between distributing tangible, income-producing marital assets and awarding maintenance from the income those assets generate, holding that doing both does not constitute impermissible “double counting.” This decision is particularly relevant in cases involving rental properties, business interests, and other income-generating assets subject to equitable distribution.
Equitable Distribution of Marital Property
The final step is the equitable distribution of marital property. The court (or a settlement agreement) will ultimately divide and apportion the various marital assets and debts between the parties. It is essential to note that the distribution process does not necessarily provide each party with equal assets. Instead, the law provides that the courts are to endeavor to equitably distribute assets, in accordance with Domestic Relations Law § 236 (b)(5)(d). In Price v. Price, 69 N.Y.2d 8 (1986), the Court of Appeals emphasized that courts have broad discretion in fashioning an equitable distribution award and that no single statutory factor is dispositive. The Court recognized that the equitable distribution statute was designed to treat marriage as an economic partnership, entitling each spouse to a fair share of the marital assets based on the totality of the circumstances — including the indirect contributions of a spouse as homemaker and parent.
Proper distribution of pensions, 401(k) plans and other retirement accounts is a crucial component of any New York divorce case. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) are often utilized to properly distribute each party’s share of such accounts. A QDRO is a legal order served on a retirement plan administrator that outlines how various benefits will be divided between spouses in a divorce. It ensures that each party receives their share of the retirement benefits accumulated during the marriage directly from the retirement plan, without incurring tax penalties or early withdrawal fees.
In Suffolk County, where many families hold significant equity in their homes and maintain retirement accounts through local employers, the proper distribution of these assets often drives the outcome of the entire divorce. Our attorneys regularly handle equitable distribution matters involving Long Island real estate, public employee pension plans (such as NYSTRS, NYSLRS, and NYCERS), 401(k) accounts, and privately held businesses operating throughout Suffolk and Nassau Counties.
Debts accumulated during the marriage are also subject to equitable distribution in New York divorce cases. These debts may include mortgages, credit card debt, and student loans. The court will consider factors such as who incurred the debt, the purpose of the debt, and each spouse’s ability to repay it when determining how to divide marital debts. In some cases, the court may order one spouse to assume responsibility for certain debts, while in others, the debts may be divided between the spouses based on their respective financial situations.
Factors Considered in Equitable Distribution
As set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236(b), the various factors the Court is to consider in determining equitable distribution include:
- the income and property of each party at the time of marriage, and at the time of the commencement of the action;
- the duration of the marriage and the age and health of both parties;
- the need of a custodial parent to occupy or own the marital residence and to use or own its household effects;
- the loss of inheritance and pension rights upon dissolution of the marriage as of the date of dissolution;
- the loss of health insurance benefits upon dissolution of the marriage;
- any award of maintenance under subdivision six of this part;
- any equitable claim to, interest in, or direct or indirect contribution made to the acquisition of such marital property by the party not having title, including joint efforts or expenditures and contributions and services as a spouse, parent, wage earner and homemaker, and to the career or career potential of the other party. The court shall not consider as marital property subject to distribution the value of a spouse’s enhanced earning capacity arising from a license, degree, celebrity goodwill, or career enhancement. However, in arriving at an equitable division of marital property, the court shall consider the direct or indirect contributions to the development during the marriage of the enhanced earning capacity of the other spouse;
- the liquid or non-liquid character of all marital property;
- the probable future financial circumstances of each party;
- the impossibility or difficulty of evaluating any component asset or any interest in a business, corporation or profession, and the economic desirability of retaining such asset or interest intact and free from any claim or interference by the other party;
- the tax consequences to each party;
- the wasteful dissipation of assets by either spouse;
- any transfer or encumbrance made in contemplation of a matrimonial action without fair consideration;
- whether either party has committed an act or acts of domestic violence, as described in subdivision one of section four hundred fifty-nine-a of the social services law, against the other party and the nature, extent, duration and impact of such act or acts;
- in awarding the possession of a companion animal, the court shall consider the best interest of such animal. “Companion animal”, as used in this subparagraph, shall have the same meaning as in subdivision five of section three hundred fifty of the agriculture and markets law; and
- any other factor which the court shall expressly find to be just and proper.
New York Equitable Distribution Law FAQ
New York is an equitable distribution state. Equitable distribution refers to the legal principle governing the division of marital assets and liabilities in a divorce. In a NY divorce, any marital property, regardless of title, is subject to distribution. An equitable distribution of assets, by definition, means that the assets may disproportionately distributed between the parties.
Assets in a divorce in New York are split in the equitable distribution process. Equitable distribution in New York involves the parties identifying all assets, determining whether each asset is marital or separate property in its nature, valuing each asset and then distributing the assets equitably. Under an equitable distribution approach, as employed in New York State, property is not automatically split equally (50/50) and, instead, various factors will guide the amount and nature of each party’s award.
An essential aspect of equitable distribution law is that equitable does not mean equal. Either party is entitled to request that the Court award specific assets to that individual or award a greater portion of the assets. The intention is for the distribution to be fair and just without necessarily being equal.
New York’s Domestic Relations Law provides that neither the Husband or Wife is presumptively entitled to a greater share of assets simply by virtue of their gender. Similar rules apply with regard to maintenance, child support, counsel fees and all other aspects of matrimonial law in New York. As such, a Wife is not necessarily entitled to any greater rights, support or property than a spouse.
New York State law does not mandate that all marital property be distributed on a 50 / 50 basis. Equitable distribution of assets requires that the Court distribute both marital assets and marital debts between the parties in accordance with the various factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (b)(5)(d).
The parties’ various entitlements to any equity in the home, as well as the ability to satisfy mortgage obligations will always be considered as well. On Long Island, where home values in many Suffolk County communities routinely exceed state averages, the marital residence is frequently the most valuable asset subject to equitable distribution.
In New York, an inheritance is the recipient’s separate property and, therefore, is not subject to distribution. Of course, exceptions to this general rule do exist. Specifically, if an inheritance is commingled with marital assets or otherwise spent down during the marriage, it may lose its separate property character and become subject to equitable distribution.
Equitable distribution is a legal principle by which marital property is distributed. In equitable distribution, marital assets are divided based on fairness and equity, without necessarily providing for equal distribution. Community property distribution is a a lesser utilized approach wherein all marital assets are generally split equally between the parties. New York is an equitable distribution state, not a community property state.
A house owned before a marriage is separate property in a New York divorce, although further analysis is often required. The non-titled spouse may assert any number of claims including that that the house has been transmuted into marital property or that a portion of the equity is subject to distribution due to financial contributions to the property during the marriage.
New York Equitable Distribution Lawyer
The Law Office of Louis L. Sternberg, P.C. represents clients in equitable distribution matters throughout Suffolk County and Nassau County. Attorney Louis Sternberg, a New York Metro Super Lawyers honoree from 2021 through 2025, leads a team of four attorneys who focus exclusively on divorce and family law. Our firm regularly handles contested property division involving Long Island real estate, business valuations, pension and retirement account distributions, hidden asset investigations, and QDRO preparation.
Whether your case involves a marital home in Suffolk County, a closely held business, stock options, deferred compensation, or complex retirement holdings, we work with forensic accountants, real estate appraisers, and business valuation professionals to build the strongest possible case for a fair distribution. We understand that equitable distribution is often the most consequential financial event of a client’s life, and we approach every case with that understanding.
Contact us online today to schedule your free initial consultation, or call us directly at 631-600-3295. Our office is located at 330 Motor Parkway, Suite 100, Hauppauge, and we serve clients across Long Island.
You must be logged in to post a comment.